Get verified for the Top 100 →
200+Doors managed
34Years in business
3.8Google · 139 reviews
See the review analysis ↓

PM company in Berkeley, CA

PERFORMANCE SNAPSHOT · ESTIMATED · PUBLIC REVIEWS

What 139 public reviewers say about Raj Properties

We read all 139 public Google reviews to estimate what property owners praise and complain about — and what tenants say about the same company.

Estimated · public reviews · as of Oct 30, 2026

3.8headline rating · 139 reviews
WHO WROTE THEM
  • 72% tenants · ~100 · 4.2 stars
  • 8% unattributed · 12 · 3.3 stars
  • 19% rating only · 26 · 2.6 stars
  • 1% excluded · 1 · 2.0 stars

Property owners

Not enough property owners reviews yet. We need at least 10 property owners reviews to show an estimated rating and themes for this group.

Tenants

~100 reviews

Estimated

Stable

20 of 100 gave 1–2 stars (20%)

What unhappy tenants say

  • Unprofessional conduct11 of 20
  • Quality of repairs8 of 20
  • Communication breakdowns7 of 20

Also mentioned

  • Friendly, helpful staff
  • Communication & responsiveness

Summary

139 reviews of Raj Properties

Of the 139 public reviews we read, 113 had text we could classify. Star-only ratings and spam or off-topic reviews are counted in the strip above but not in this summary.

Summary of Property Owner Reviews for Raj Properties

Property owners (0 reviews): not enough attributed reviews to estimate a rating.

Summary of Tenant Reviews for Raj Properties

Tenants (100 reviews) rate Raj Properties 4.2 out of 5. 20 of them (20%) gave 1–2 stars, most often about unprofessional conduct (11 of 20) and quality of repairs (8 of 20). They also mention friendly, helpful staff and communication & responsiveness.

12 reviews don't say who wrote them. 26 are star ratings with no text. 1 off-topic review is excluded.

Estimated from public reviews as of Oct 30, 2026. Not a TrueMatch score.

Are you Raj Properties?

Owners reading this see “Unprofessional conduct”. Answer it with verified owner survey results.

Claim & respond →

Report a problem with this estimate

VERIFIED · RANKED ON PERFORMANCE, NOT REVIEWS

Top-ranked verified property managers serving Raj Properties's markets

Service area

48 cities listed for Raj Properties.

Area: smoothed merge of ~5 mi buffers (≈2 mi gap close). Dots: each ZIP centroid (darker = primary). Illustrative only. © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap

Customer Reviews & Ratings

Google
3.8

Based on 139 reviews

Are you Raj Properties?

Property owners searching for a manager in Berkeley see this page. Claim it, sync your data, and show verified performance instead of public reviews.

Claim & get verified →

How PropertyManagement.com rates property managers

How does verification work?

A property manager claims its profile, connects its management software through a read-only sync, and runs property owner surveys through PropertyManagement.com. Certifications and the verified badge come from that data, and no fee can change any of it.

What does “Listed, not rated” mean?

The company appears in our directory but has not verified, so it has no TrueMatch™ score. Anything shown about its reviews is an estimate built from public Google reviews, not a rating from PropertyManagement.com.

Can a property manager pay to appear on this page?

No. Companies cannot pay to be listed, to change their estimate or score, or to have the estimate removed. The only way to replace the estimate is to get verified.

Why are public reviews split into property owners and tenants?

Property owners and tenants want different things from a property manager. A single average hides what matters to an owner, so we estimate who wrote each review and summarize each group separately.

How does Raj Properties correct or replace this estimate?

By claiming this profile and getting verified. Once verified, the estimate is replaced with verified performance data and property owner survey results.

How do I report a problem with this estimate?

Use the “Report a problem with this estimate” link under the review snapshot, or email support@propertymanagement.com with the company name and what looks wrong.