Get verified for the Top 100 →

480 Realty & Property Management Mesa

200+Doors managed
2Years in business
4.6Google · 107 reviews
4.9est.Property owner rating
See the review analysis ↓

PM company in Mesa, AZ

PERFORMANCE SNAPSHOT · ESTIMATED · PUBLIC REVIEWS

What 107 public reviewers say about 480 Realty & Property Management Mesa

We read all 107 public Google reviews to estimate what property owners praise and complain about — and what tenants say about the same company.

Estimated · public reviews · as of Sep 30, 2026

4.6headline rating · 107 reviews
WHO WROTE THEM
  • 29% property owners · ~31 · 4.9 stars
  • 19% tenants · ~20 · 3.5 stars
  • 27% unattributed · 29 · 5.0 stars
  • 16% rating only · 17 · 4.6 stars
  • 9% excluded · 10 · 4.7 stars

Property owners

~31 reviews

Estimated

↑ 0.3 in 24 mo

Property owners praise

  • Communication & responsiveness· 55%
  • Friendly, helpful staff· 52%
  • Professionalism· 35%

Property owners complain about

    Tenants

    ~20 reviews

    Estimated

    Stable

    Tenants praise

    • Fast maintenance turnaround· 25%
    • Communication & responsiveness· 25%
    • Professionalism· 20%

    Tenants complain about

    • Unprofessional conduct30%
    • Communication breakdowns15%
    • Hard to reach a person10%

    Summary

    107 reviews of 480 Realty & Property Management Mesa

    Of the 107 public reviews we read, 90 had text we could classify. Star-only ratings and spam or off-topic reviews are counted in the strip above but not in this summary.

    Summary of Property Owner Reviews for 480 Realty & Property Management Mesa

    Property owners (in 31 reviews) rate the experience with 480 Realty & Property Management Mesa 4.9 out of 5; with communication and staff friendliness being highlighted strengths.

    Summary of Tenant Reviews for 480 Realty & Property Management Mesa

    Tenants (20 reviews) rate 480 Realty & Property Management Mesa 3.5 out of 5; they most often praise maintenance turnaround and complain about professionalism (30% of tenant reviews).

    29 reviews don't say who wrote them. 17 are star ratings with no text. 7 written by agents, vendors or partners and 3 off-topic reviews are excluded.

    Estimated from public reviews as of Sep 30, 2026. Not a TrueMatch score.

    Report a problem with this estimate

    VERIFIED PERFORMANCE REPORT

    How 480 Realty & Property Management Mesa compares with verified Chandler Heights property managers

    Verified property managers sync their management software and let PropertyManagement.com survey their clients directly. Unverified property managers have no verified record, so they can only be estimated from public reviews.

    Metric

    480 Realty & Property Management Mesa

    No verified record

    Verified PMs · Chandler Heights (2)

    Verified client surveys · certified metrics

    Phone picked up (not voicemail)
    480 Realty & Property Management MesaNo verified data
    Verified PMs · Chandler Heights (2)52%1 of 2 · 202 property owner responses
    Median repair time
    480 Realty & Property Management MesaNo verified data
    Verified PMs · Chandler Heights (2)6.0 days1 of 2 certified
    Occupancy rate
    480 Realty & Property Management MesaNo verified data
    Verified PMs · Chandler Heights (2)94.6%1 of 2 certified
    Property owner satisfaction
    480 Realty & Property Management MesaNo verified data
    Verified PMs · Chandler Heights (2)89% of property owners satisfied2 of 2 · 305 property owner responses

    Verified values are live where the manager’s software is synced, otherwise as certified.

    Verified data as of Oct 13, 2026

    Like a vehicle history report for your property manager: the verified record is the one they can’t edit.

    VERIFIED · RANKED ON PERFORMANCE, NOT REVIEWS

    Top-ranked verified property managers serving 480 Realty & Property Management Mesa's markets

    Service area map

    Area: smoothed merge of ~5 mi buffers (≈2 mi gap close). Dots: each ZIP centroid (darker = primary). Illustrative only. © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap

    Customer Reviews & Ratings

    Google
    4.6

    Based on 107 reviews

    Better Business Bureau
    NR

    BBB and Yelp ratings are influenced by ads or paid accreditation. They are shown for transparency but don’t affect a TrueMatch™ score.

    Are you 480 Realty & Property Management Mesa?

    Property owners searching for a manager in Chandler Heights see this page. Claim it, sync your data, and show verified performance instead of public reviews.

    Claim & get verified →

    How PropertyManagement.com rates property managers

    How does verification work?

    A property manager claims its profile, connects its management software through a read-only sync, and runs property owner surveys through PropertyManagement.com. Certifications and the verified badge come from that data, and no fee can change any of it.

    What does “Listed, not rated” mean?

    The company appears in our directory but has not verified, so it has no TrueMatch™ score. Anything shown about its reviews is an estimate built from public Google reviews, not a rating from PropertyManagement.com.

    Can a property manager pay to appear on this page?

    No. Companies cannot pay to be listed, to change their estimate or score, or to have the estimate removed. The only way to replace the estimate is to get verified.

    Why are public reviews split into property owners and tenants?

    Property owners and tenants want different things from a property manager. A single average hides what matters to an owner, so we estimate who wrote each review and summarize each group separately.

    How does 480 Realty & Property Management Mesa correct or replace this estimate?

    By claiming this profile and getting verified. Once verified, the estimate is replaced with verified performance data and property owner survey results.

    How do I report a problem with this estimate?

    Use the “Report a problem with this estimate” link under the review snapshot, or email support@propertymanagement.com with the company name and what looks wrong.